Difference between revisions of "Virtual pipe organ"
Boxofstops (Talk | contribs) |
Boxofstops (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Clearly the story of the organ goes back many centuries, but how does the virtual pipe organ fit in this rich history of bellows and pallets? | Clearly the story of the organ goes back many centuries, but how does the virtual pipe organ fit in this rich history of bellows and pallets? | ||
| − | Relative to the world of the organ, this is new, and emerging, topic. There seems to be no official definition | + | Relative to the world of the organ, this is new, and emerging, topic. There seems to be no official definition, not even a Wikipedia page as yet. |
The name suggests any organ that wants to sound like it has pipes. For example electronic organs, since the 1930s or so, have been getting better and better at this. Meanwhile others are taking the sound in new and wonderful directions too. | The name suggests any organ that wants to sound like it has pipes. For example electronic organs, since the 1930s or so, have been getting better and better at this. Meanwhile others are taking the sound in new and wonderful directions too. | ||
Revision as of 12:09, 13 May 2017
You only have to hit the notes at the right time and the instrument plays itself JS Bach
Welcome to Box Of Stops, which is a small virtual pipe organ, designed to run on a Raspberry Pi.
Clearly the story of the organ goes back many centuries, but how does the virtual pipe organ fit in this rich history of bellows and pallets?
Relative to the world of the organ, this is new, and emerging, topic. There seems to be no official definition, not even a Wikipedia page as yet.
The name suggests any organ that wants to sound like it has pipes. For example electronic organs, since the 1930s or so, have been getting better and better at this. Meanwhile others are taking the sound in new and wonderful directions too.
In the computing world, virtual tends to mean an emulation of some kind. Maybe of reality, or even another computer. But something that has been simulated, as opposed to being built from moving parts. Think bits, bytes and pixels, rather than wood, metal and string.
Soon after electronics got good enough to build an organ, they got good enough to build the universal machine that Turing described. This is a properly versatile invention, and still showing us its abilities. Perhaps this leads to an expectation, because the computer can do so many things, it is always the best tool for the job.
There could be a case for some division of labour here. Especially in the musical world, simpler is often better, and more playable too. If you have a keyboard or synth that can create a refined sound, and a computer that's good at crunching numbers, why not take advantage of both of these strengths?
